网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
度洛西汀对男性初发性抑郁障碍症患者性激素、骨密度、睡眠质量 及神经功能的影响
作者:盛祖基 
单位:湖北省阳新县精神卫生中心
关键词:抑郁症 度洛西汀 男性 骨密度 性激素 
分类号:
出版年·卷·期(页码):2017·45·第一期(51-55)
摘要:

目的 分析度洛西汀对男性初发性抑郁障碍症患者性激素、骨密度、睡眠质量及神经功能的影响。方法 选取2012年4月-2015年4月我院收治的42例男性初发性抑郁障碍症患者作为研究对象,为观察组,均接受度洛西汀治疗,比较患者治疗前后性激素水平、骨密度、睡眠质量及神经功能的变化情况,评估度洛西汀在抑郁障碍症中的应用价值,并与健康正常人对照。结果 ①治疗后,患者雌二醇、睾酮水平分别为(351.05±175.56)pmol/L、(64.63±17.41)nmol/L,与治疗前对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但低于正常健康人(P<0.05);②治疗后,患者胫骨骨密度、L1-L4骨密度分别降低至(0.73±0.08)g/cm2、(0.91±0.11)g/cm2,与治疗前相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),与正常健康人对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);③治疗后,患者入睡时间、睡眠时间、睡眠效率、日间功能、睡眠质量、睡眠障碍评分分别为(1.57±0.81)分、(1.21±0.66)分、(1.21±0.78)分、(1.30±0.49)分、(1.43±0.88)分、(1.12±0.74)分,与治疗前对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);④治疗后,患者仅韦克斯勒成人智力测量表测试评分上升至(12.07±8.33)分,与治疗前对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);⑤本组痊愈18例(42.86%),有效20例(47.62%),无效4例(9.52%),总有效率为90.48%。结论 在男性首发抑郁障碍症患者的临床治疗中,采用度洛西汀治疗,可改善患者性激素水平,优化睡眠质量与神经功能,对患者骨密度无不良影响,值得推广。

Objective To analyze the effect of duloxetine on sex hormone, bone mineral density, sleep quality and neurological function in the male patients with primary depressive disorder. Methods 42 cases of male patients with primary depressive disorder who were admitted in our hospital between April 2012 and April 2015 were selected as the study objects and were included in the observation group. All the patients were treated with duloxetine. The changes of sex hormone level, bone mineral density, sleep quality and neurological function before and after the treatment were compared. The application value of duloxetine in depressive disorder was evaluated and compared with that in normal healthy people. Results After the treatment, ①The levels of estradiol and testosterone were (351.05±175.56) pmol/L and (64.63±17.41) nmol/L, respectively. Compared with those before the treatment, there were significant differences (P<0.05) but they were lower than those in normal healthy people (P<0.05); ②the tibia bone mineral density and L1-L4 bone mineral density of the patients decreased to(0.73±0.08)g/cm2 and(0.91±0.11)g/cm2 , respectively. Compared with those before the treatment, there were no significant differences (P>0.05) and compared with those in in normal healthy people, there also were no significant differences (P>0.05) ;③the scores of time to falling asleep, sleep time, sleep efficiency, daytime function, sleep quality and sleep disturbance were (1.57± 0.81), (1.21±0.66), (1.12±0.78), (1.30±0.49),(1.43±0.88)and(1.12±0.74), respectively. Compared with those before the treatment, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05); ④only the test scores of Wechsler adult intelligence measurement table increased to (12.07±8.33). Compared with that before the treatment, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); ⑤In this group, 18 cases were cured (42.86%), 20 cases were effective (47.62%) and 4 cases were invalid (9.52%). The total

参考文献:
服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 748496 位访问者


 ©《现代医学》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481;83272479
电子邮件: xdyx@pub.seu.edu.cn

苏ICP备09058541