Objective:To investigate the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopy in patients with colorectal cancer and liver metastasis. Methods:66 colorectal cancer with liver metastasis patients admitted into our department from June 2015 to August 2017 were divided into 2 groups according to the surgical method:laparotomy group (n=33) and laparoscopic group (n=33). The patients in the laparotomy group underwent open surgery, the patients in the laparoscopic group underwent laparoscopy. The therapeutic effect of two groups was evaluated by WHO's tumor effect standard. The operation time, blood loss, anal exhaust time, hospitalization time and the time of postoperative chemotherapy were recorded. The incision infection, abdominal abscess, intestinal obstruction and gastrointestinal bleeding were recorded and statistically analyzed. The patients were followed up for 5 years. The cumulative postoperative survival rate of 1, 2 and 3 years, clinical efficacy, survival rate and safety of the two groups were compared. Results:The response rate of laparoscopic group was 33.33% (28/33), higher than 21.21%(21/33) of the laparotomy group (P<0.05). There was no significant differences between 2 groups in postoperative chemotherapy (P<0.05); Postoperative anal exhaust and hospital stay were shorter (less) in the laparotomy group (P<0.05),laparoscopic operation time was longer than that in the laparotomy group (P<0.05). while laparoscopic incision infection, the incidences of the abdominal abscess, intestinal obstruction and gastrointestinal bleeding were significantly lower in the laparoscopic group than those of the laparotomy group (P<0.05). The 1-year, 2-year and 3-year survival rates of the laparoscopic group were 81.82% (27/33) 69.70% (23/33) and 54.55%(18/33), respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the open surgery group 72.73%(24/33), 57.58%(19/33) and 30.30%(10/33) respectively(P<0.05). Compared with the laparotomy group, the survival rate of 3 years in the laparoscopic group were significantly higher (P<0.05). Conclusions:Laparoscopic surgery in patients with colorectal cancer and liver metastasis is helpful to improve the clinical curative effect, having the advantages of less traumatic operation and quick recovery after operation. It is helpful to improve the survival rate of patients and is worth popularizing and applying. |
[1] 姚宏伟,修典荣,付卫,等.腹腔镜手术治疗可切除的结直肠癌伴肝转移的前瞻性病例系列研究[J].中华外科杂志,2014,52(12):919-923.
[2] 熊小勇,徐降兴,习举云.腹腔镜手术对比开腹手术在结直肠癌根治术中的安全性及远期疗效评估[J].实用癌症杂志,2016,31(10):1665-1668.
[3] 叶青海,柳双.腹腔镜及机器人手术在结直肠癌肝转移治疗中的合理应用及评价[J].中国实用外科杂志,2016,36(4):399-403.
[4] CRISTOBAL I,TORREJON B,GONZALEZALONSO P,et al.Downregulation of miR-138 as a contributing mechanism to Lcn-2 overexpression in colorectal cancer with liver metastasis[J].World J Surg,2016,40(4):1021-1022.
[5] 姚宏伟,姚响芸,孙涛,等.腹腔镜结直肠癌根治性切除联合同期腹腔镜或开腹肝大部切除术治疗同时性结直肠癌肝转移的疗效分析[J].中华消化外科杂志,2016,15(2):128-134.
[6] 王鸿,陈伟平.腹腔镜和开腹手术治疗结直肠癌伴发肝转移患者的临床疗效研究分析[J].浙江创伤外科,2016,21(3):479-480.
[7] 陆伟群,刘磊,江陈非.腹腔镜辅助经肛内镜结直肠癌根治术治疗结直肠癌患者效果观察及其安全性评价[J].全科医学临床与教育,2016,14(5):538-540.
[8] INUFUSA H,NAKAMURA M,ADACHI T,et al.Localization of oncofetal and normal fibronectin in colorectal cancer.Correlation with histologic grade,liver metastasis,and prognosis[J].Cancer,2015,75(12):2802-2808.
[9] 刘博.腹腔镜根治性手术治疗结直肠癌的安全性及临床疗效观察[J].中国实用医药,2016,11(16):117-118.
[10] NAKYAMA N,YAMASHITA K,TANAKA T,et al.Genomic gain of the PRL-3 gene may represent poor prognosis of primary colorectal cancer,and associate with liver metastasis[J].Clin Exp Metastasis,2016,33(1):1-11.
[11] 李瑞,孙海明,牟一平,等.腹腔镜一期切除结直肠癌及肝转移癌的临床观察[J].中国医师杂志,2015,17(5):664-666.
[12] 汪刘华,王少军,赵恒兰,等.腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术在老年患者中的应用探讨[J].大连医科大学学报,2016,38(6):594-597.
[13] 郭玉霖,杨培,徐晓,等.腹腔镜下同期结直肠癌和肝转移灶切除术的安全性和疗效分析[J].解放军医学院学报,2017,38(1):26-29.
[14] 郑树国.联合肝脏分隔和门静脉结扎的二步肝切除术在结直肠癌肝转移治疗中的价值和评价[J].中国实用外科杂志,2016,36(4):403-407. |