KTH整合式健康教育对全髋关节置换术患者康复效果的影响-现代医学

KTH整合式健康教育对全髋关节置换术患者康复效果的影响

单位：达州市中心医院骨科, 四川达州 635000

分类号：R47

出版年·卷·期（页码）：2019·47·第五期（600-603）

摘要：

目的：探讨KTH整合式健康教育对全髋关节置换术患者康复效果的影响。方法：选取2016年7月至2018年7月在本院实行全髋关节置换术的患者98例。匹配患者年龄、性别、婚姻状况、文化程度、职业状态及经济收入等条件，采用随机分层抽样方式将患者分为研究组和对照组，各49例。对照组采取传统的健康教育方式，研究组采用KTH整合式健康教育模式。术后1个月比较两组患者Harris髋关节评分、日常生活能力，出院时比较两组护理满意度评分。结果：Harris髋关节评分显示，研究组患者关节功能、关节活动度、疼痛评分均高于对照组（P<0.05），总分也高于对照组（P<0.05）。研究组患者日常生活能力评分高于对照组（P<0.05），护理满意度评分也高于对照组（P<0.05）。结论：KTH整合式健康教育能够有效改善全髋关节置换术患者术后关节功能，提高患者日常生活能力，提高护理满意度，可在护理实践中推广应用。

Objective:To investigate the effect of health education of KTH integrated model on rehabilitation of patients undergoing total hip replacement. Methods:A total of 98 cases of total hip arthroplasty in our hospital from July 2016 to July 2018 were selected. According to the age, sex, marital status, educational level, occupational status and economic income, the patients were divided into study group and control group by random stratified sampling with 49 patients in each group. The control group adopted traditional health education mode, while the research group adopted KTH integrated health education mode. Harris hip score and ADL were compared between the two groups one month after operation. Nursing satisfaction scores were compared between the two groups at discharge. Results:Harris hip score showed that the joint function, joint mobility and pain score of the study group were higher than those of the control group(P<0.05). And the total score of the study group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05). The daily life ability score of the study group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05). The nursing satisfaction score of the study group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion:KTH integrated health education can effectively improve the joint function of patients after total hip arthroplasty, improve the ability of daily living of patients, improve nursing satisfaction, and can be popularized and applied in nursing practice.

参考文献：

[1] MÄKELÄ K T, MATILAINEN M, PULKKINEN P, et al. Countrywise results of total hip replacement:an analysis of 438,733 hips based on the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association database[J]. Acta Orthopaedica, 2014,85(2):107-116.
[2] SHAKYA R,亓一鸣,芮云峰, 等. 氨甲环酸在全髋关节置换术中的应用进展[J]. 东南大学学报(医学版), 2018, 37(1):137-141.
[3] 向成浩,陈文革,蒋从斌,等.人工全髋关节置换术后早期脱位八例报告并文献复习[J].中国骨与关节杂志, 2016,5(2):114-119.
[4] 黄勇,唐杞衡,尹星华,等.同期双侧、单侧人工髋膝关节置换术后并发症发生情况及严重并发症危险因素分析[J].山东医药, 2016, 56(11):81-83.
[5] 张会敏,朱丽丽,张海洋,等.KTH整合式护理干预对社区2型糖尿病患者生活质量的影响[J].中国老年学杂志, 2015,35(14):4010-4011.
[6] 郝雁,孙朝阳,王艳丽.KTH整合式健康教育在社区老年高血压患者中的应用及效果评价[J].中国健康教育, 2015,31(10):986-988.
[7] MAHOMED N N, ARNDT D C, MCGRORY B J, et al. The Harris hip score:comparison of patient self-report with surgeon assessment[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2001, 16(5):575-580.
[8] 唐泓源,杨明玉,张黎明.全髋关节置换术病人感觉与功能评价量表的编制与评价[J].中华现代护理杂志, 2010, 16(33):3969-3973.
[9] 汪清秀,孙旭文,石鸿艳,等.知信行模式干预对社区老年高血压患者自我管理行为的影响[J].护理学杂志, 2015, 30(1):88-90.
[10] 李园园.知信行模式在支气管肺炎患儿家属健康教育中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志, 2018,24(11):70-72.
[11] 蒋梅,刘晓晨,张兰.健康信念模式在2型糖尿病患者行为改变中的应用[J].中华护理杂志, 2010, 45(9):807-810.
[12] 周善娟, 郭飞, 刘国珍, 等. 基于跨理论模型的家庭访视对人工髋关节置换术后患者髋关节功能的影响[J]. 现代临床护理, 2017, 16(9):40-43.
[13] SALLIS J F, OWEN N, FISHER E, et al. Ecological models of health behavior[J]. Health EducBehav, 2015, 4(1):116.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏】

提示：您还未登录，请登录！点此登录