VAC技术联合扩创植皮术治疗痛风石破溃的临床效果评价-现代医学

VAC技术联合扩创植皮术治疗痛风石破溃的临床效果评价

单位：绵阳市中心医院整形烧伤外科, 四川绵阳 621000

分类号：R459.7

出版年·卷·期（页码）：2019·47·第七期（851-854）

摘要：

目的：探讨真空辅助闭合（VAC）技术联合扩创植皮术治疗痛风石破溃的效果及对瘢痕情况的影响。方法：选择2016年1月至2018年1月我院收治的80例痛风石破溃患者，按照随机数字表法将患者分为观察组及对照组，各40例。观察组患者采用VAC技术联合扩创植皮术，对照组患者采用常规换药治疗。比较两组之间创面愈合率、临床指标、并发症及瘢痕的发生情况的差异。结果：伤口处理后7、14 d观察组患者的创面愈合率均大于对照组（P<0.05）；观察组患者的住院、感染控制、创面恢复时间均短于对照组，数字评分法疼痛评分均低于对照组；观察组患者皮瓣腔隙、皮肤浸渍出现几率均明显低于对照组；观察组患者的轻度瘢痕发生率明显高于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）。结论：VAC技术联合扩创植皮术治疗痛风石破溃效果良好，明显降低了患者感染风险，缩短了创面痊愈时间，美学指标优良，值得在临床工作中进行推广。

Objective:To analyze effect of vacuum assisted closure (VAC) technique combined with debridement and skin grafting in the treatment of gouty stone rupture. Methods:Eighty patients with gouty stone rupture in our hospital from January 2016 to January 2018 were selected anddivided into the observation group and the control group according to random number table method, 40 cases in each group. Patients in the observation group were treated with VAC combined with debridement and skin grafting, while patients in the control group were treated with routine dressing change. The differences of wound healing rate, clinical index, complications and scar condition between the two groups were comparied. Results:After 7 and 14 days of wound treatment, the wound healing rate of the observation group was higher than those of the control group (all P<0.05); the hospitalization, infection control, wound recovery time of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group, and the pain score of numerical rating scale was lower than that of the control group; the occurrence rate of flaps lacunae and skin impregnation in the observation group was significantly lower than those of the control group. The incidence of mild scar of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion:VAC technique combined with debridement and skin grafting in the treatment of gouty stone repture has a good therapeutic effect.It could reduce the risk of infection significantly, shortens recovery timeand aesthetic indicators isgood. It is worth promoting.

参考文献：

[1] 张倩茹,王昱,邓雪蓉,等.痛风患者发生关节超声下尿酸盐沉积的危险因素分析[J].中华风湿病学杂志,2018,22(2):105-109.
[2] 刘岩,刘帆.一例全身散在痛风结节合并长期腹泻的肥胖患者Ⅱ度以上重症压疮的循证护理[J].护士进修杂志,2016,31(3):262-265.
[3] 朱芙蓉,段文丽,朱西利.负压封闭引流技术配合辨证施护治疗痛风石破溃的护理[J].当代护士(学术版旬刊),2017,1(6):46-48.
[4] 黄文卫,谢卫国,夏红霞,等.人工真皮联合自体薄层皮片移植修复下肢创伤骨外露创面[J].中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版),2016,11(3):225-228.
[5] 钟洪,陈宝田,罗仁.痛风诊断标准探讨[J].河北中西医结合杂志,1998(3):324-325.
[6] 谢晓勇,沈胜生,黄良通,等.烧伤后感染难愈创面应用扩创植皮术联合负压引流术治疗的效果分析[J].中国实用医药,2017,12(36):75-76.
[7] SIPE J C,KNOBLER R L,BRAHENY S L,et al.A neurologic rating scale (NRS) for use in multiple sclerosis[J].Neurology,1984,34(10):1368-1372.
[8] 徐建军,李林辉,张鹏,等.薄层削痂及井网划痕术联合封闭式负压引流技术治疗早期中小面积深Ⅱ度创面的临床疗效[J].中国现代医生,2018,56(8):7-11.
[9] 符婷,尹如兰,李立人,等.痛风患者生活质量评价的研究进展[J].东南大学学报(医学版),2017,36(4):147-152.
[10] DATTA S,MANOLY I,KARANGELIS D,et al.Pseudoaneurysm of right internal mammary artery post vacuum assisted closure therapy-a rare complication and literature review[J].Ann Vasc Surg,2016,31:e1-3.
[11] 刘云峰.使用VSD联合扩创植皮术治疗大面积烧伤感染难愈创面的价值分析[J].当代医药论丛,2015,13(11):169-170.
[12] 陈华铭.扩创植皮术联合VSD治疗烧伤MRSA感染难愈创面临床研究[J].内蒙古医学杂志,2017,49(8):968-970.
[13] 马彩虹,贺立新,李冬海,等.VSD辅助手术治疗在修复难治性瘢痕溃疡中的效果观察[J].中国美容医学,2015,24(20):3-6.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏】

提示：您还未登录，请登录！点此登录