网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
小骨窗经外侧裂-岛叶入路微创术治疗基底节区脑出血的疗效及炎症-氧化应激状态研究
作者:马世龙1  熊明2 
单位:1. 新疆喀什地区第一人民医院 重症医学二科 神经外科ICU, 新疆 喀什 844000;
2. 新疆喀什地区第一人民医院 重症医学二科 综合创伤ICU, 新疆 喀什 844000
关键词:基底节区 脑出血 小骨窗显微手术 经外侧裂-岛叶入路 炎症反应 氧化应激 
分类号:R741.05
出版年·卷·期(页码):2019·47·第八期(887-892)
摘要:

目的:研究小骨窗经外侧裂-岛叶入路微创术治疗基底节区脑出血的临床疗效及对炎症-氧化应激状态的影响。方法:将96例拟行小骨窗微创手术的基底节区脑出血患者按随机数字表法分为经外侧裂-岛叶入路组(A组,n=48)和经颞叶皮质入路组(B组,n=48)。比较两组围手术期情况及术后6个月临床转归。分别在术前及术后1、3、7 d测定血清炎症指标[白介素-6(IL-6)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、高迁移率族蛋白1(HMGB-1)]和氧化应激指标[超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、丙二醛(MDA)]。结果:两组术中出血量、手术时间、术后意识恢复时间及并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组血肿清除率≥ 90%占87.50%,显著高于B组的70.83%(P<0.05);术后1、3、7 d,A组血清IL-6、TNF-α、CRP、HMGB-1、MDA显著低于B组,SOD显著高于B组(P<0.05);术后6个月,A组预后良好率55.56%,显著高于B组的32.56%(P<0.05)。结论:小骨窗经外侧裂-岛叶入路微创术与经颞叶皮质入路相比,具有创伤小、炎症-氧化应激影响小等优点,且近期预后良好。

Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of small skull-window microsurgery through lateral fissure-insula lobe approach for cerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia and its influence on inflammation-oxidative stress. Methods:Ninety-six cases of patients with basal ganglia cerebral hemorrhage undergoing small skull-window microsurgery were randomly divided into two groups:the lateral fissure-insula lobe approach group (group A, n=48) and temporal lobe cortex approach group (group B, n=48). The perioperative conditions and clinical outcome were compared between the two groups.The serum levels of inflammatory markers[interleukin-6 (IL-6),tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), C-reactive protein (CRP), high mobility group protein-1 (HMGB-1)] and oxidative stress indicators[superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA)] were measured before surgery and on the 1st,3rd,7th day after surgery. Results:There were no significant differences in intraoperative bleeding, operation time, postoperative recovery time and incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The hematoma clearance rate ≥ 95% was 87.50% in group A, significantly higher than 70.83% in group B (P<0.05). On the 1st, 3rd and 7th day after surgery,the serum levels of IL-6, TNF-α, CRP, HMGB-1 and MDA in group A were significantly lower than those in the group B, while SOD levels were significantly higher (P<0.05); At 6 months after surgery, the good rate of prognosis was 55.56% in group A, significantly higher than 32.56% in group B (P<0.05). Conclusion:Compared with temporal lobe cortex approach,the small skull-window microsurgery through lateral fissure-insula lobe approach for the treatment of basal ganglia cerebral hemorrhage has the advantages of less trauma and less inflammatory-oxidative stress, and the short-term prognosis is good.

参考文献:

[1] 张传强,杨美霞,卢姗姗,等.早期经侧裂入路显微手术治疗基底节区高血压脑出血[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,21(2):128-128.
[2] 李红闪,史彦芳,郭毅,等.经侧裂-岛叶入路小骨窗显微手术治疗高血压性基底节区出血[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,21(12):777-778.
[3] 杨海峰,孙跃春,崔刚.小骨窗开颅经侧裂-岛叶入路显微手术治疗基底节区脑出血[J].中国临床医生杂志,2017,45(5):76-78.
[4] LAST J,PERRECH M,DENIZCI C,et al.Long-term functional recovery and quality of the life after surgicaltreatment of putaminal hemorrhages[J].J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis,2015,24(5):925-929.
[5] 杜庆林.小骨窗经外侧裂微创术与立体定向微创术对基底节脑出血的疗效比较[J].解放军预防医学杂志,2016,34(5):745-747.
[6] 蒋铭,李军,龙飞,等.经颞叶皮质与经外侧裂-岛叶血肿腔入路手术治疗自发性脑壳核区出血临床对比研究[J].神经损伤与功能重建,2016,11(6):549-550.
[7] 陈奇翰,邓刚,周键,等.显微镜下侧裂-岛叶入路治疗基底节区高血压脑出血患者的临床疗效[J].重庆医学,2017,46(A02):233-235.
[8] 贺虎.经外侧裂入路显微手术治疗高血压基底节区脑出血(附47例临床分析)[J].立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志,2017,30(4):218-220.
[9] 李宝东,王存祖,陈冬云,等.经外侧裂-岛叶与经皮质入路血肿清除术治疗高血压性基底节出血的比较[J].国际脑血管病杂志,2014,22(12):911-914.
[10] 张文琦,张超,田增有,等.脑出血引起继发性炎症反应机制研究进展[J].河北联合大学学报(医学版),2015,18(4):76-78.
[11] 王庆熙,吴赛珍.超敏C反应蛋白和血清铁蛋白与脑出血患者预后的相关性研究[J].中国现代医生,2016,54(20):6-9.
[12] 王为文,张伟,闫忠军,等.小骨窗微创手术治疗急性基底节区高血压脑出血疗效分析[J].临床军医杂志,2017,45(12):1226-1229,1232.
[13] 李丽敏,赵迎春.高迁移率族蛋白-1与脑出血[J].国际脑血管病杂志,2016,24(6):565-568.
[14] 马征,孙雅菲,康玲伶,等.急性脑出血患者血清炎性因子和氧化应激产物的动态监测及临床意义[J].河北医药,2014,22(11):1692-1694.
[15] 康东,蒋永明,曾春,等.立体定向软通道穿刺术对高血压脑出血患者应激状态及脑血流的影响[J].疑难病杂志,2014,13(12):1211-1214.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 741458 位访问者


 ©《现代医学》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481;83272479
电子邮件: xdyx@pub.seu.edu.cn

苏ICP备09058541