网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
评价医疗器械体外细胞毒性的常用方法概述
作者:张世明  陶树清 
单位:哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院 骨关节科, 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150086
关键词:生物相容性评价 细胞毒性试验 浸提液试验 直接接触试验 间接接触试验 
分类号:R197.39
出版年·卷·期(页码):2020·48·第一期(146-150)
摘要:

医疗器械和材料应用于临床之前需要进行生物相容性评价。国内外均将细胞毒性试验列在生物相容性评价的首位。细胞毒性试验分为三大类:浸提液试验、直接接触试验和间接接触试验。文章将对三种细胞毒性试验的核心要素和主要步骤加以介绍,并对三种细胞毒性试验的敏感性特点及相互关系加以概述。

Biocompatibility assessment of medical devices and materials is required before clinical application. Cytotoxicity test has been listed as the first step in biocompatibility evaluation both at home and abroad. Cytotoxicity tests can be divided into three categories:extraction test, direct contact test and indirect contact test. This article will introduce the core elements and main steps of the three cytotoxicity tests, and summary the sensitivity and correlation of the three cytotoxicity tests.

参考文献:

[1] ZENG R,DIETZEL W,WITTE F,et al.Progress and challenge for magnesium alloys as biomaterials[J].Advanced Engineering Materials,Acta Biomater.2018,71:1-23.
[2] 中华人民共和国质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 16886-2017/ISO 10993:2009医疗器械生物学评价[S].
[3] PESCHECK M,CONSTANZE D,LUDEK B,et al.Novel rapid in vitro cytotoxicity test on mammalian cells based on an electrochemical measuring method[J].Journal of Applied Electrochemistry,2014,44(8):935-943.
[4] 中华人民共和国质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 16886.5-2017/ISO 10993-5:2009医疗器械生物学评价第5部分:体外细胞毒性试验[S].
[5] LIM S M,YAP A,LOO C,et al.Comparison of cytotoxicity test models for evaluating resin-based composites[J].Hum Exp Toxicol.2017,36(4):339-348.
[6] HATTORI K,NAKADATE K,MORII A,et al.Exposure to nano-size titanium dioxide causes oxidative damages in human mesothelial cells:the crystal form rather than size of particle contributes to cytotoxicity[J].Biochem Biophys Res Commun.2017,492(2):218-223.
[7] LI P,SCHILLE C,SCHWEIZER E,et al.Selection of extraction medium influences cytotoxicity of zinc and its alloys[J].Acta Biomater.2019,09.
[8] HU M L,LIN H,JIANG R D,et al.Porous zirconia ceramic as an alternative to dentin for in vitro dentin barriers cytotoxicity test[J].Clin Oral Investig.2018,22(5):2081-2088.
[9] CINTRA L T A,BENETTI F,de AZEVEDO QUEIROZ,et al.Cytotoxicity,biocompatibility,and biomineralization of the new high-plasticity MTA material[J].Journal of Endodontics,2017,43(5):774-778.
[10] KWON J S,KIM K M,KIM K N.A comparative study of three cytotoxicity test methods for nanomaterials using sodium lauryl sulfate[J].J Nanosci Nanotechnol,2014,14(14):8043-8047.
[11] SLUTZKEY,SHIMSHON,MOSES,et al.Direct contact test for evaluating bacterial growth on machined and rough surface implants:an invitro study.[J].Implant Dent.2017,26(6):899-903.
[12] ATES G,VANHAECKE T,ROGIERS V,et al.Assaying cellular viability using the neutral red uptake assay[J].Methods Mol Biol.2017,1601:19-26.
[13] KUHBIER J W,COGER V,MUELLER J,et al.Influence of direct or indirect contact for the cytotoxicity and blood compatibility of spider silk[J].J Mater Sci Mater Med.2017,28(8):127.
[14] BELLUCCI D,SALVATORI R,ANESI A,et al.SBF assays,direct and indirect cell culture tests to evaluate the biological performance of bioglasses and bioglass-based composites:three paradigmatic cases.[J].Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl,2019,96:757-764.
[15] 中华人民共和国质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 16886.12-2017/ISO 10993-12:2012医疗器械生物学评价第12部分:体外细胞毒性试验[S].
[16] CAO T,SAW T Y,HENG B C,et al.Comparison of different test models for the assessment of cytotoxicity of composite resins[J].Journal of Applied Toxicology,2005,25(2):101-108.
[17] SAW T Y,CAO T,YAP A U J,et al.Tooth slice organ culture and established cell line culture models for cytotoxicity assessment of dental materials[J].Toxicol In Vitro.2005,19(1):145-154.
[18] JUNG O,SMEETS R,HARTJEN,et al.Improved In vitro test procedure for full assessment of the cytocompatibility of degradable magnesium based on ISO 10993-5/-12[J].Int J Mol Sci.2019,10;20(2).

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 757278 位访问者


 ©《现代医学》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481;83272479
电子邮件: xdyx@pub.seu.edu.cn

苏ICP备09058541