网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
新生儿早发型败血症与晚发型败血症病原菌分布及炎性因子变化比较
作者:吴艳蓉  梁跃波  彭发兵  刘玉平 
单位:重庆市黔江中心医院 新生儿科, 重庆 409099
关键词:新生儿早发型败血症 新生儿晚发型败血症 炎症 革兰阴性菌 革兰阳性菌 
分类号:R722.13+1
出版年·卷·期(页码):2022·50·第一期(90-94)
摘要:

目的:探究新生儿早发型败血症(EOS)与晚发型败血症(LOS)病原菌分布及炎性因子变化。方法:选取2019年10月—2020年12月本科室收治的新生儿败血症患儿60例,其中30例EOS患儿作为早发组,30例LOS患儿作为晚发组。比浊法检测血超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)水平,电化学发光法检测降钙素原(PCT)水平,血培养进行病原菌检测,MIC法进行药敏试验。结果:EOS患儿胎龄、出生体质量、出生窒息、母孕期感染、胎膜早破和宫内窘迫发生率要显著高于LOS(P<0.05)。早发组感染革兰阴性菌菌株数显著高于晚发组,而感染革兰阳性菌菌株数则显著低于晚发组(P<0.05);早发组病原菌主要以大肠埃希菌(26.67%)和肺炎克雷伯菌(16.67%)为主;晚发组病原菌主要以凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(30.00%)和金黄色葡萄球菌(16.67%)为主;革兰阴性菌及革兰阳性菌对青霉素、氨苄西林耐药率均较高,对头孢曲松耐药率均较低。与晚发组相比,早发组血白细胞(WBC)、hs-CRP和PCT水平无显著性差异(P>0.05),血小板(PLT)水平显著降低(P<0.05)。治疗36 h后,两组PLT水平均显著增加,而血PCT、hs-CRP则显著降低(P<0.05),WBC水平仍无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论:EOS与LOS的主要病原菌构成、耐药性以及炎性细胞因子水平有所不同,该结果对疾病的早期检测、区分疾病类型以及合理使用抗生素具有重要参考价值。

Objective:To explore the pathogen distributionandinflammatory factors in neonates withearly-onset sepsis(EOS) and late-onset sepsis(LOS).Methods:From October 2019 to December 2020, 60 cases of neonatal septicemia were selected, among them, 30 cases with EOS were regarded as early onset group, and 30 cases with LOS children as late-onset group. The levels of hypersensitive C-reactive protein(hs-CRP) and procalcitonin(PCT) were measured by turbidimetry and electrochemiluminescence; blood culture was used to detect pathogenic bacteria and Mic method was used for drug sensitivity test.Results:The incidence of gestational age, birth weight, birth asphyxia, maternal pregnancy infection, premature rupture of membranes and intrauterine distress in EOS children were significantly higher than those in LOS children(P<0.05). The number of strains infected with Gram-negative bacteria in the early-onset group was significantly higher than that in the late-onset group, while the number of strains infected with Gram-positive bacteria in the early-onset group was significantly lower than that in the late-onset group(P<0.05); the main pathogens in early onset group were Escherichia coli(26.67%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae(16.67%); the main pathogens in late onset group were coagulase negative staphylococcus(30.00%) and Staphylococcus aureus(16.67%); the resistance rates of gram negative bacteria and gram positive bacteria to penicillin and ampicillin were higher, while that to ceftriaxone was lower. Compared with those in the late-onset group, the levels of white blood cell count(WBC), hs-CRP and PCT in the early-onset group had no significant difference(P>0.05), while the level of platelet(PLT) was significantly lower(P<0.05). After 36 hours of treatment, the level of PLT in both groups was significantly higher, while PCT and hs-CRP were significantly lower(P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in WBC level(P>0.05).Conclusion:The main pathogenic bacteria composition, drug resistance and inflammatory cytokine levels of EOS and LOS are different, which has important reference value for early detection of disease, differentiation of disease types and rational use of antibiotics.

参考文献:

[1] 李秀兰,钟晓云,吴艳.新生儿早发型与晚发型败血症临床特征及病原学研究[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2019,19(6):594-599.
[2] 朱道谋,钟丽花,陈彩华.血清和尿NGAL、KIM-1、CysC对晚发型败血症新生儿急性肾损伤的早期预警价值[J].东南大学学报(医学版),2021,40(2):176-182.
[3] 欧阳燕峰,彭华保.新生儿败血症诊断进展[J].医学理论与实践,2020,33(10):1596-1598.
[4] 刘春花.早发型和晚发型新生儿败血症临床特点、病原菌分布及菌株耐药状况分析[J].中外医学研究,2019,17(17):68-70.
[5] RUAN L,CHEN G Y,LIU Z,et al.The combination of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein or presepsin alone improves the accuracy of diagnosis of neonatal sepsis:a meta-analysis and systematic review[J].Crit Care,2018,22(1):316-324.
[6] 郝盈夏,余加林.常用新生儿败血症实验室检测指标研究进展[J].现代医药卫生,2020,36(16):2580-2583.
[7] 李伟,中国医师协会新生儿科医师分会感染专业委员会,中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组.新生儿败血症诊断及治疗专家共识(2019年版)[J].中华儿科杂志,2019,57(4):252-257.
[8] POKHREL B,KOIRALA T,SHAH G,et al.Bacteriological profile and antibiotic susceptibility of neonatal sepsis in neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital in Nepal[J].BMC Pediatr,2018,18(1):208-215.
[9] SCHRAG S J,FARLEY M M,PETIT S,et al.Epidemiology of invasive early-onset neonatal sepsis,2005 to 2014[J].Pediatrics,2016,138(6):e20162013-e20162023.
[10] 施金桔,张惠月.早发型与晚发型新生儿败血症的高危因素对比分析[J].中国卫生标准管理,2018,9(5):57-59.
[11] 洪美婷,敖当.新生儿败血症的诊疗进展[J].中国医学创新,2020,17(13):168-172.
[12] 王芳.早发型与晚发型新生儿败血症围生因素和病原菌及耐药性差异性比较[J].包头医学,2020,44(3):35-38.
[13] 胡冬梅,陈梅,于航.早晚发新生儿败血症高危因素与局部感染发生率[J].热带医学杂志,2018,18(3):380-382,391.
[14] MEMAR M Y,ALIZADEH N,VARSHOCHI M,et al.Immunologic biomarkers for diagnostic of early-onset neonatal sepsis[J].J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2019,32(1):143-153.
[15] ESCHBORN S,WEITKAMP J H.Procalcitonin versus C-reactive protein:review of kinetics and performance for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis[J].J Perinatol,2019,39(7):893-903.
[16] BOSKABADI H,ZAKERIHAMIDI M.Evaluate the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis by measuring interleukins:a systematic review[J].Pediatr Neonatol,2018,59(4):329-338.
[17] 高芮,冯星.新生儿败血症中相关因素的临床分析[J].中国医学创新,2020,17(3):124-127.
[18] PRAVIN C M V,KALAIVANI R,VENKATESH S,et al.Evaluation of procalcitonin as a diagnostic marker in neonatal sepsis[J].Indian J Pathol Microbiol,2018,61(1):81-84.
[19] 谷磊,杨玉芹,王霞.PCT、hs-CRP及二者联合检测对新生儿败血症的诊断价值[J].检验医学,2018,33(7):597-600.
[20] 邓文喻,曾丽,陈国洋,等.早发型与迟发型新生儿败血症临床指标及病原菌分析[J].国际医药卫生导报,2019,25(18):3024-3027.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 751574 位访问者


 ©《现代医学》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481;83272479
电子邮件: xdyx@pub.seu.edu.cn

苏ICP备09058541