网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
不同干预措施预防依托咪酯肌阵挛的有效性和安全性:基于贝叶斯的网状Meta分析
作者:贺静雯  陈文栋  王燕琼  和文艳  任紫婷  杨伟 
单位:昆明医科大学第一附属医院 麻醉科, 云南 昆明 650032
关键词:依托咪酯 肌阵挛 网状Meta分析 随机对照试验 
分类号:R614
出版年·卷·期(页码):2025·53·第七期(1059-1068)
摘要:

目的:基于贝叶斯理论的网状Meta分析评估不同干预措施预防依托咪酯肌阵挛的有效性和安全性,旨在临床上减少并改善依托咪酯肌阵挛的发生。方法:通过Pubmed、Embase、the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials(CENTRAL)、中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、维普中文期刊服务平台、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)等数据库检索不同干预措施预防依托咪酯肌阵挛的以中、英文文献发表的随机对照试验(RCTs),检索时间为建库至 2024年8月。使用Cochrane风险偏倚评估工具对文献质量进行评价,使用Revman 5.4及Stata 18.0软件进行贝叶斯网状Meta分析,使用相对危险度(RR)和相应的95%置信区间(CI )评估依托咪酯肌阵挛的干预措施有效性和安全性。结果:共纳入37篇文章,包含3 078例受试者,涉及8种干预措施:咪达唑仑、布托啡诺、地佐辛、右美托咪定、瑞芬太尼、舒芬太尼、芬太尼和生理盐水/空白对照。网状Meta分析结果显示,舒芬太尼(RR=0.10,95%CI 0.04~0.27)、瑞芬太尼(RR=0.14,95%CI 0.08~0.24)、地佐辛(RR=0.18,95%CI 0.09~0.34)、布托啡诺(RR=0.19,95%CI 0.10~0.35)、右美托咪定(RR=0.20,95%CI 0.12~0.33)、咪达唑仑(RR=0.22,95%CI 0.12~0.41)6种干预措施预防效果均优于生理盐水/空白对照(均P<0.05);舒芬太尼(RR=0.22,95%CI 0.06~0.84)、瑞芬太尼(RR=0.32,95%CI 0.12~0.89)2种干预措施预防效果优于芬太尼(均P<0.05)。SUCRA概率排序结果显示,舒芬太尼(89.0%)>瑞芬太尼(78.3%)>地佐辛(60.4%)>布托啡诺(56.9%)>右美托咪定(51.1%)>咪达唑仑(45.7%)>芬太尼(18.0%)>生理盐水/空白对照(0.5%)。对纳入研究进行发表偏倚分析,发现结局指标存在一定的不对称性,提示存在一定的发表偏倚风险。结论:通过网状Meta分析整合不同药物之间直接或间接证据结果发现,阿片类药物能够有效降低依托咪酯所致肌阵挛的发生率,其中舒芬太尼的效果最好,其次为瑞芬太尼。但使用阿片类药物预处理时应注意胸壁僵直、心率减慢等并发症的发生。

Objective:To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different interventions to prevent etomidate-induced myoclonus based on Bayesian network Meta-analysis, aiming at reducing and improving the occurrence of etomidate myoclonus clinically.Methods:Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials(CENTRAL), China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI), Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, VIP Chinese Journal Service Platform and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database(CBM) were used to retrieve randomized controlled trials(RCTs) published in Chinese and English on different interventions for the prevention of etomidate-induced myoclonus from the establishment of the database to August 2024. Revman 5.4 and Stata 18.0 software were used for Bayesian network meta-analysis. The relative risk(RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval(CI) were used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different interventions for etomidate myoclonus. Results:A total of 37 articles with 3 078 subjects were included, involving 8 interventions: midazolam, butorphanol, dezocine, dexmedetomidine, remifentanil, sufentanil, fentanyl and placebo. The results of network meta-analysis showed that sufentanil(RR=0.10, 95%CI 0.04-0.27), remifentanil(RR=0.14, 95%CI 0.08-0.24), dezocine(RR=0.18, 95%CI 0.09-0.34), butorphanol(RR=0.19, 95%CI 0.04-0.27), dexmedetomidine(RR=0.20, 95%CI 0.12-0.33), midazolam(RR=0.22, 95%CI 0.12-0.41) were better than placebo(all P<0.05). Sufentanil(RR=0.22, 95%CI 0.06-0.84) and remifentanil(RR=0.32, 95%CI 0.12-0.89) had a better preventive effect than fentanyl(both P<0.05). SUCRA probability ranking results showed that sufentanil(89.0%)>remifentanil(78.3%)>dezocine(60.4%)>butorphanol(56.9%)>dexmedetomidine(51.1%)>midazolam(45.7%)>fentanyl(18.0%)>placebo(0.5%). The publication bias analysis of the included studies showed that there was a certain asymmetry in the outcome indicators, suggesting that there was a certain risk of publication bias. Conclusion:Through network Meta-analysis integrating direct or indirect evidence between different drugs, it is found that opioids can effectively reduce the incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus, among which sufentanil has the best effect, followed by remifentanil. However, attention should be paid to the occurrence of complications such as chest wall rigidity and slow heart rate when using opioid pretreatment.

参考文献:

[1] ERDOES G,BASCIANI R M,EBERLE B.Etomidate—a review of robust evidence for its use in various clinical scenarios[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2014,58(4):380-389.
[2] 王太云,刘宜平,李恩有.依托咪酯常见不良反应及预防新策略研究进展[J].中国医药,2021,6(9):1411-1414.
[3] 任学军,吕楠,李梦杰,等.全麻外科手术地佐辛与芬太尼预处理对依托咪酯致肌阵挛的预防效果[J].河南外科学杂志,2024,30(3):49-51.
[4] SCHWARZKOPF K R,HUETER L,SIMON M,et al.Midazolam pretreatment reduces etomidate-induced myoclonic movements[J].Anaesth Intensive Care,2003,31(1):18-20.
[5] 卢吉灿,刘超,贾燕,等.咪达唑仑预处理减少依托咪酯所致的肌阵挛[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2009,30(11):1287-1288.
[6] 王润.小剂量咪唑安定联合依托咪酯对全麻诱导中减轻肌阵挛的临床作用探讨[J].西部医学,2012,24(1):104-105.
[7] SEDIGHINEJAD A,NADERI N B,HAGHIGHI M,et al.Comparison of the effects of low-dose midazolam,magnesium sulfate,remifentanil and low-dose etomidate on prevention of etomidate-induced myoclonus in orthopedic surgeries[J].Anesth Pain Med,2016,6(2):e35333.
[8] DEY S,KUMAR M.Comparison of pretreatment with dexmedetomidine with midazolam for prevention of etomidate-induced myoclonus and attenuation of stress response at intubation:a randomized controlled study[J].J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol,2018,34(1):94-98.
[9] 任杰,兰萍,袁瑞梅.布托啡诺预处理对依托咪酯全麻诱导时诱发肌阵挛的影响[J].山东医药,2013,53(48):58-60.
[10] 张婧,刘玲,吕国义.预先静注布托啡诺与地佐辛抑制依托咪酯所致肌阵挛效应的比较[J].天津医药,2015,43(12):1450-1453.
[11] 张婧.预注布托啡诺或地佐辛抑制依托咪酯诱发肌阵挛效果观察[D].天津:天津医科大学,2016.
[12] 何亮.阿片部分激动拮抗剂对依托咪酯肌阵挛的防治作用[D].南京:南京医科大学,2016.
[13] RAUTELA R S,GULABANI M,KUMAR P,et al.Comparative assessment of dexmedetomidine and butorphanol for attenuation of etomidate-induced myoclonus:a double-blind,randomised controlled study[J].Indian J Anaesth,2023,67(9):815-820.
[14] LV Z,FANG J,ZHU J,et al.Intravenous dezocine pretreatment reduces the incidence and intensity of myoclonus induced by etomidate[J].J Anesth,2014,28(6):944-947.
[15] 张擎,何亮,刘存明.地佐辛对依托咪酯诱发肌阵挛的预防效果[J].江苏医药,2014,40(21):2601-2603.
[16] 周晓琳,陈俊亭,于巍,等.地佐辛抑制依托咪酯所致肌阵挛时对心率和平均动脉压影响的临床研究[J].现代生物医学进展,2015,15(13):2491-2494.
[17] 陈龙谦,黄慧瑜,熊理锋,等.地佐辛和舒芬太尼预给药对依托咪酯所致肌阵挛的效果对比观察[J].广西医学,2017,39(6):903-904.
[18] 赵玉华,韩雪萍.右美托咪定与地佐辛对依托咪酯全麻诱导时肌阵挛的影响[J].河南医学研究,2018,27(5):792-794.
[19] MIZRAK A,KORUK S,BILGI M,et al.Pretreatment with dexmedetomidine or thiopental decreases myoclonus after etomidate:a randomized,double-blind controlled trial[J].J Surg Res,2010,159(1):e11-e16.
[20] 赵晓虹,高成杰,王建,等.右美托咪定预处理减少依托咪酯所致肌阵挛的临床观察[J].山西医药杂志(下半月刊),2011,40(12):1220-1221.
[21] 康振明,谢文钦,谢文吉,等.右美托咪定与咪达唑仑对依托咪酯全麻诱导时肌阵挛影响的对比研究[J].中国医学创新,2013,10(5):11-13.
[22] 罗晓春,钟强,沈七襄.右美托咪定抑制依托咪酯发生肌阵挛的疗效观察[J].医药前沿,2013(25):222-223.
[23] LUAN H F,ZHAO Z B,FENG J Y,et al.Prevention of etomidate-induced myoclonus during anesthetic induction by pretreatment with dexmedetomidine[J].Braz J Med Biol Res,2015,48(2):186-190.
[24] MIAO S,ZOU L,WANG G,et al.Effect of dexmedetomidine on etomidate-induced myoclonus:a randomized,double-blind controlled trial[J].Drug Des Devel Ther,2019,27(13):1803-1808.
[25] 袁春梅.右美托咪定对依托咪酯全麻诱导气管插管心血管反应及肌阵挛的影响[D].汕头:汕头大学,2021.
[26] 张宁,张爱民,王冉,等.右美托咪定与利多卡因预处理对全麻诱导时依托咪酯不良反应的影响[J].安徽医药,2021,25(1):152-155.
[27] GHODKI P S,SHETYE N N.Pretreatment with dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulphate in prevention of etomidate induced myoclonus—a double blinded randomised controlled trial[J].Indian J Anaesth,2021,65(5):404-407.
[28] KELSAKA E,KARAKAYA D,SARIHASAN B,et al.Remifentanil pretreatment reduces myoclonus after etomidate[J].J Clin Anesth,2006,18(2):83-86.
[29] HWANG J Y,KIM J H,OH A Y,et al.A comparison of midazolam with remifentanil for the prevention of myoclonic movements following etomidate injection[J].J Int Med Res,2008,36(1):17-22.
[30] 陈俊亭,崔晓光,李文志,等.雷米芬太尼对依托咪酯引发肌震颤的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2008,24(10):867-869.
[31] 赵晓虹,李金宝,邓小明,等.雷米芬太尼预处理减少依托咪酯所致肌阵挛[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2008,24(6):482-483.
[32] 陈怡,王国林,于泳浩.不同阿片类药对依托咪酯诱导中肌阵挛和BIS的影响[J].天津医药,2009,37(5):368-370.
[33] LEE S W,GILL H J,PARK S C,et al.The effect of remifentanil for reducing myoclonus during induction of anesthesia with etomidate[J].Korean J Anesthesiol,2009,57(4):438-443.
[34] 滑炜.预处理对减少依托咪酯所致肌阵挛120例临床观察[J].航空航天医药,2010,21(6):910-912.
[35] 张本发.预注不同剂量雷米芬太尼对依托咪酯引发肌震颤影响的因素分析[J].中国医师进修杂志,2011,34(3):57-58.
[36] 李超,李恒.新型阿片类药物对依托咪酯致肌震颤的效果观察[J].广东医学,2012,33(16):2493-2495.
[37] HUETER L,SCHWARZKOPF K,SIMON M,et al.Pretreatment with sufentanil reduces myoclonus after etomidate[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2003,47(4):482-484.
[38] 徐进,李平,周彤,等.不同剂量舒芬太尼抑制依托咪酯引起肌震颤反应的比较[J].中国临床药理学杂志,2013,29(10):789-791.
[39] 汪伟,吕洁,钱燕宁,等.羟考酮或芬太尼预给药对依托咪酯所致肌阵挛的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2015,31(7):707-708.
[40] WANG W,LV J,WANG Q,et al.Oxycodone for prevention of etomidate-induced myoclonus:a randomized double-blind controlled trial[J].J Int Med Res,2018,46(5):1839-1845.
[41] ZHANG K D,WANG L Y,ZHANG D X,et al.Comparison of the effectiveness of various drug interventions to prevent etomidate-induced myoclonus:a Bayesian network Meta-analysis[J].Front Med(Lausanne),2022,26(9):799156.
[42] 徐若沦,解通,胡庆坤,等.依托咪酯药理作用、药物代谢动力学及毒理学研究[J].广东公安科技,2022,30(2):43-45.
[43] 任益锋,石薇,陈程哲,等.预注纳布啡对全麻诱导期依托咪酯诱发肌阵挛的影响[J].中国医药导报,2019,16(25):99-102.
[44] YILMAZ C M,DEMIREL I,DURAN E,et al.Effect of gabapentin pretreatment on myoclonus after etomidate:a randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled study[J].Braz J Anesthesiol,2016,66(4):356-362.
[45] LOACKER S,SAYYAH M,WITTMANN W,et al.Endogenous dynorphin in epileptogenesis and epilepsy:anticonvulsant net effect via kappa opioid receptors[J].Brain,2007,130(4):1017-1028.
[46] GHARAGOZLOU P,HASHEMI E,DELOREY T M,et al.Pharmacological pro-files of opioid ligands at kappa opioid receptors[J].BMC Pharmacol,2006(6):3.
[47] 陈祖萍,程崇学,李大佳,等.右美托咪定减轻依托咪酯诱导诱发肌阵挛的效果[J].江苏医药,2016,42(21):2335-2337.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 971360 位访问者


 ©《现代医学》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481;83272479
电子邮件: xdyx@pub.seu.edu.cn

本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626

苏ICP备09058541