网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
内镜黏膜下剥离术后患者中重度疼痛影响因素分析及预测模型的构建
作者:李楠楠  赵芹  杨华  唐德华 
单位:南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院 消化科, 江苏 南京 210008
关键词:消化道早癌 癌前病变 内镜黏膜下剥离术 术后疼痛 预测模型 
分类号:R473.5
出版年·卷·期(页码):2025·53·第十二期(1851-1858)
摘要:

目的:探讨内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)后患者中重度疼痛的危险因素,并构建与验证列线图预测模型。方法:回顾性纳入2022年1月至2024年10月期间在我院行ESD的消化道早癌及癌前病变患者297例,根据术后视觉模拟评分(VAS)将患者分为轻度疼痛组(n=175)和中重度疼痛组(n=122),比较两组患者临床数据。单因素与多因素Logistic回归分析和筛选患者术后中重度疼痛的独立危险因素;R软件中“rms”包构建列线图,十折交叉验证模型的泛化能力和稳定性,并通过区分度、校准度和临床实用性评价模型的预测性能。结果:Logistic回归分析显示,临床诊断(恶性)(OR=1.888,95%CI 1.029~3.466)、术后并发症(OR=4.561,95%CI 2.522~8.248)、手术时间(≥60 min)(OR=2.170,95%CI 1.136~4.145)、创面大小(≥7 cm2)(OR=2.031,95%CI 1.035~3.986)、手术部位(十二指肠:OR=10.616,95%CI 2.684~41.987;食管:OR=5.717,95%CI 1.991~16.417;胃体:OR=4.456,95%CI 1.576~12.602;胃窦:OR=3.250,95%CI 1.040~10.158)是ESD后患者中重度疼痛的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。十折交叉验证计算的准确率为0.715。Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验(χ2=2.938,P=0.891)表明该模型拟合良好;曲线下面积(AUC)为0.807(95%CI 0.757~0.856),提示模型区分度良好。决策曲线分析提示,在高风险阈值4%~77%的范围内,使用本列线图进行临床决策能带来最大的净获益。结论:临床诊断(恶性)、术后并发症、手术时间(≥60 min)、创面大小(≥7 cm2)及手术部位(十二指肠、食管、胃体和胃窦)是ESD术后患者中重度疼痛的独立危险因素;基于上述危险因子构建的列线图预测模型具有良好的区分度与校准能力,可用于消化道早癌及癌前病变行ESD术后高风险患者的早期预警、识别高风险患者并指导围术期个体化镇痛管理,提升患者围术期护理质量。

Objective: To investigate risk factors for moderate to severe postoperative pain in patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) and develop a prediction model to validate it. Methods: A retrospective data analysis was conducted in 297 patients who underwent ESD for early gastrointestinal cancer or precancerous lesions from January 2022 to October 2024 at our hospital. Based on postoperative visual analog scale(VAS) scores, patients were stratified into mild pain group(n=175) and moderate to severe pain group(n=122), and then clinical data were compared between two groups. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors for moderate to severe postoperative pain, followed by a construction of nomogram predictive model using the “rms” package in R software. Thereafter, ten-fold cross-validation was used to verify the generalization capability and stability of the algorithm, and simultaneously its predictive performance was assessed by the discrimination, calibration, and clinical application. Results: Logistic regression analysis showed that clinical malignant diagnosis(OR=1.888,95%CI 1.029-3.466), postoperative complications(OR=4.561,95%CI 2.522-8.248), procedure duration(≥60 min)(OR=2.170,95%CI 1.136-4.145), lesion size(≥7 cm2)(OR=2.031,95%CI 1.035-3.986), and surgical site(duodenal: OR=10.616, 95%CI 2.684-41.987); esophageal: OR=5.717, 95%CI 1.991-16.417; gastric body: OR=4.456, 95%CI 1.576-12.602; gastric antrum: OR=3.250, 95%CI 1.040-10.158) were independent risk factors for moderate to severe postoperative pain in patients with ESD(P<0.05). The accuracy of ten-fold cross-validation was 0.715. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test(χ2=2.938, P=0.891) and area under the curve(AUC) of 0.807(95%CI 0.757-0.856) separately suggested a good fit and a good discriminatory power of the model. Finally, the “non-compliance prediction column chart” can derive the greatest net benefit for clinical decision-making within the high-risk threshold range of 4% to 77%. Conclusion: Malignant diagnosis, complications, surgical time(≥60 min), lesion size(≥ 7 cm2), and surgical site(duodenum, esophagus, gastric body, and antrum) are independent risk factors for moderate to severe pain after ESD. Based on these risk factors, the constructed nomogram prediction model has a good discrimination and calibration ability, which can be used to evaluate early warning of high-risk patients with ESD for early gastrointestinal cancer and precancerous lesions, so as to take targeted pain management measures and improve the quality of perioperative care for patients.

参考文献:

[1] 徐瑞,陈光勇.消化道早癌规范化病理学诊断的相关问题[J].中华内科杂志,2020,59(6):470-472.
[2] HUANG J,LUCERO-PRISNO III D E,ZHANG L,et al.Updated epidemiology of gastrointestinal cancers in East Asia[J].Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol,2023,20(5):271-287.
[3] 中国抗癌协会胃癌专业委员会.2024版CACA胃癌整合诊治指南(精简版)[J].中国肿瘤临床,2024,51(13):650-657.
[4] 国家消化系统疾病临床医学研究中心,中华医学会消化内镜学分会,中国医师协会消化医师分会.胃内镜黏膜下剥离术围手术期指南(2025版)[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2025,42(6):421-437.
[5] 杨晓艳,史伟东.消化道早癌患者内镜黏膜下剥离术后感染的相关因素[J].吉林医学,2024,45(10):2441-2443.
[6] 张海燕,朱凌楠,姜稳妮,等.按病种分值付费方式下加速康复外科护理在消化道早癌行内镜黏膜下剥离术患者中的应用效果[J].中国实用护理杂志,2024,40(5):338-343.
[7] 庄海月,丁文琴,郭丽,等.体位管理在行胃内镜黏膜下剥离术患者中的应用[J].现代医学,2022,50(7):901-904.
[8] CHOI H S,KIM K O,CHUN H J,et al.The efficacy of transdermal fentanyl for pain relief after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective,randomized controlled trial[J].Dig Liver Dis,2012,44(11):925-929.
[9] 洪春香,李淑香.内镜下ESD术治疗消化道早癌预防术后出血的围术期护理干预价值和效果探讨[J].黑龙江中医药,2023,52(5):214-216.
[10] 蒋宝玲,申妮,冯菊菊.消化道早癌患者ESD术后抑郁情况及其危险因素分析[J].国际精神病学杂志,2024,51(5):1561-1563.
[11] LUO X,HOU H J,CHEN P S,et al.Addition of dexmedetomidine to the anesthesia regimen attenuates pain and improves early recovery after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial[J].Drug Des Devel Ther,2024,18:4551-4562.
[12] WU S,WANG S,DING Y,et al.Establishment and validation of risk prediction models for postoperative pain after endoscopic submucosal dissection: A retrospective clinical study[J].J Multidiscip Healthc,2024,17:3889-3905.
[13] 倪平,陈京立,刘娜.护理研究中量性研究的样本量估计[J].中华护理杂志,2010,45(4):378-380.
[14] 赫捷,陈万青,李霓,等.中国食管癌筛查与早诊早治指南(2022,北京)[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2022,44(6):491-522.
[15] 赫捷,陈万青,李兆申,等.中国胃癌筛查与早诊早治指南(2022,北京)[J].中华消化外科杂志,2022,21(7):827-851.
[16] 赵振刚.1021例消化道早癌及癌前病变患者临床分析[J].实用临床医学,2023,24(6):1-6,14.
[17] 张萍,方雅璇,项平.深部开放伤口疼痛管理循证护理审查指标的实施及困难因素分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2020,22(6):544-548.
[18] SPITZER R L,KROENKE K,WILLIAMS J B,et al.A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7[J].Arch Intern Med,2006,16(10):1092-1097.
[19] 何筱衍,李春波,钱洁,等.广泛性焦虑量表在综合性医院的信度和效度研究[J].上海精神医学,2010,22(4):200-203.
[20] 刘敏,阿姆斯特丹.术前焦虑与信息量表中文版在局部麻醉患者术前焦虑中的信效度研究[J].华西医学,2022,37(8):1193-1194.
[21] 曹玲燕,张磊.食管内镜黏膜下剥离患者术后并发症风险预测模型构建及验证[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2024,29(4):429-433.
[22] 李倩,夏冬梅,黄萍,等.早期食管癌及癌前病变患者内镜黏膜下剥离术后中重度疼痛的发生率及影响因素:一项单中心观察性研究[J].肿瘤预防与治疗,2025,38(8):712-718.
[23] KIM J W,JANG J Y,PARK Y M,et al.Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with pain after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasm[J].Surg Endosc,2019,33(3):794-801.
[24] 田恬,李娟,吴兆荣,等.早期食管癌患者行内镜下黏膜剥离术后不同角度体位对其疼痛的影响[J].中国实用护理杂志,2024,40(16):1201-1206.
[25] 骆霞岗,陆晨,马翔,等.直肠癌患者术后近期并发症危险因素分析及列线图预测模型的构建[J].中华结直肠疾病电子杂志,2022,11(2):127-134.
[26] 吴江.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗消化道早癌术后出血的风险模型构建[J].医学研究生学报,2021,34(2):155-159.
[27] BENITES-GOÑI H,PALACIOS-SALAS F,MARÍN-CALDERÓN L,et al.Short-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of superficial gastric neoplasms in non-Asian countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Ann Gastroenterol,2023,36(2):167-177.
[28] YAMAGUCHI H,FUKUZAWA M,KAWAI T,et al.Efficacy of endoscopic clip closure for nonperforated muscle layer exposure during esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection[J].Dis Esophagus,2022,35(10):doac009.
[29] 张雯,邱欢,魏贤,等.肺癌患者VATS术后运动恐惧与疼痛应对策略的潜在剖面分析[J].现代医学,2025,53(8):1239-1247.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 1064007 位访问者


 ©《现代医学》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481;83272479
电子邮件: xdyx@pub.seu.edu.cn

本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626

苏ICP备09058541