Objective: To compare the application effects of different pre-treatment moisturizing pretreatment schemes on the cleaning of surgical instruments with long-term retention. Methods: From Jan to June 2024, The moisturizing pretreatment records about 200 long-time unprocessed apparatus in the pelvic lymphadenectomy delivered to our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. All of the apparatus were delivered in the nighttime. The operation completion to the central sterile supply department time was longer than 6 h. According to the different pretreatment schemes, the observation group was treated with the ClnMax foam detergent(n=100); the control group was treated with the conventional medical apparatus(n=100). Group contrast results were concluded through the pretreatment time, the moisturizing scores after 6 h of pretreatment, the occult blood residual rates after pretreatment, the relative light unit(RLU) qualified rates of adenosine triphosphate(ATP), the single apparatus cleaning time, single apparatus cleaning qualified rates, work satisfaction and Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey(MBI-GS) scores. Results: Compared with the control group, the observation group had a lower incidence of healthcare-associated infections, shorter operating room pretreatment time, higher moisturizing score at 6 h, lower occult blood residual rate, and higher RLU qualified rate, all with statistically significant differences(all P<0.05). The single-instrument cleaning time in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group, and all dimensions and the total score of MBI-GS of the staff in the central sterile supply department were lower in the observation group, with statistically significant differences(P<0.05). No significant differences were found in the qualified rates of visual inspection, microscopic inspection, protein residue, and RLU between the two groups(all P>0.05). Conclusion: ClnMax foam detergent has demonstrated excellent cleaning and moisturizing effects on surgical instruments with long-term retention in the pelvic lymphadenectomy, which helps reduce the difficulty of subsequent instrument cleaning and enhance work efficiency. |
[1] 中国抗癌协会妇科肿瘤专业委员会.子宫颈癌腹腔镜技术诊治指南(2023年版)[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2023,39(3):296-302.
[2] 王开秀,韦秀佳,唐小敏,等.保湿预处理对腔镜器械清洗效果影响的研究[J].中国消毒学杂志,2020,37(9):667-669.
[3] 吕梦欣,王蒙,滕智英.不同管腔器械清洗过程参数控制对器械清洗质量的效果研究[J].现代医学,2023(6):854-857.
[4] 程玲,揭敏.基于前馈控制理念的保湿预处理对长时间滞留手术器械清洗质量的影响[J].中西医结合护理(中英文),2021,7(11):190-192.
[5] 李爱琴,张涵倬,王小丽,等.影响消毒供应中心复用医疗器械清洗质量的相关因素[J].中国消毒学杂志,2021,38(12):909-911,915.
[6] 张艺之,欧阳静,何丹丹,等.医院手术器械预处理方案的证据总结[J].护士进修杂志,2023,38(20):1880-1885.
[7] 马俊俐,王世英.不同清洗方法对外来医疗器械的清洗效果[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2020,30(13):2072-2075.
[8] 贾金华.手工预处理对消毒供应中心复用手术器械清洗质量的影响[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志,2020,5(43):174.
[9] 李海松.复用医疗器械的预处理和保湿研究进展[J].护理研究,2023,37(2):298-301.
[10] 万新翠,周淑萍,俞诗娃,等.海南省医疗机构手术器械预处理现状调查[J].中国护理管理,2022,22(2):290-293.
[11] 葛雪姣,向艺,郑宣冬.医疗器械预处理清洗机设计与应用[J].中国消毒学杂志,2021,38(10):745-747.
[12] 方雪梅.消毒供应中心医疗器械清洗质量不合格的风险预测模型构建[J].河北医药,2022,44(14):2154-2157.
[13] 王蒙,吕梦欣,滕智英,等.医用泡沫保湿清洁剂在管腔器械预处理中的应用效果[J].现代医学,2025,53(6):998-1001.
[14] 张翔,袁建芬.口腔正畸器械清洗质量的影响因素分析及改进措施[J].护理实践与研究,2020,17(8):41-42.
[15] 王开秀,韦秀佳,刘亚楠,等.保湿预处理对夜间使用腔镜器械清洗质量的影响[J].循证护理,2023,9(8):1418-1420.
[16] 高婵,张海.多酶清洗剂保湿预处理与喷洒泡沫酶洗保湿剂保湿预处理在医疗器械清洗中的效果及对院内感染发生情况的影响[J].临床医学研究与实践,2021,6(36):185-187.
[17] 巫秀珍,马笑含,李丽娣,等.隔夜手术器械预处理中保湿剂的合理应用效果分析[J].国际护理学杂志,2019,38(9):1237-1239.
[18] 陈海玲,朱岳英,胡秀英.手术后器械预处理保湿方式应用于长时间滞留手术器械清洗质量的效果分析[J].中国医疗器械信息,2021,27(11):171-172. |